
The Workshop Has Notes on the Eviction
Eleven graduate students know exactly how to improve the story. The woman who wrote it has until five to get out of her apartment.
WHY IS THIS IN THE FILE?
Nobody took responsibility quickly enough.
At 3:10 on Wednesday, eleven graduate students began improving a short story called Sixty Days. At 3:11, the author’s phone began vibrating against the underside of the seminar table. She had put it there because Professor Kells considered phones disrespectful to literature. The property manager considered unanswered calls disrespectful to a deadline.
The story had been distributed the previous Friday. Twelve pages, double-spaced, staple in the upper left corner. A woman working the closing shift at a pharmacy had received a notice to vacate her apartment. The building had been sold, and renovations would begin with the removal of the tenants. The woman had packed her books in liquor-store cartons and was waiting for an answer from a housing counselor. Her mother had offered the couch, which was six hours away and already occupied by her mother’s husband after a disagreement about his snoring.
The author, Tess Bell, sat at the end of the table with a legal pad. Under the rules, she was not allowed to speak while her classmates discussed the story. The method was intended to reproduce the experience of being read by strangers, who rarely pause halfway through a novel to ask the author what she meant. Professor Kells had explained this at orientation. He had also explained that it was a privilege to have eleven people pay such close attention to your work.
Every student was required to begin with something the story had done well.
“The opening is very clean,” said Evan, who had written more sensory detail? beside the first sentence.
“I like the restraint,” said Priya. “Though I’m not sure the restraint is earned.”
“The kettle is good,” said Miles. “I believed the kettle.”
They were referring to the sentence in which the woman filled a dented kettle, even though the electricity had been disconnected. Tess had written it at two in the morning on a folding chair beside three boxes. Her own kettle was packed somewhere under a bag of winter shoes.
The class spent fourteen minutes on the kettle. Was it a symbol of domestic continuity? Did it represent the character’s refusal to accept change? One student thought the woman should smash it. Another proposed that the kettle belong to the dead father, who was mentioned nowhere in the story but could be added in revision.
Professor Kells called this a productive disagreement.
Tess’s phone vibrated again. She moved her heel to stop the sound. On the screen, face down against her palm, were two missed calls and a text asking whether she would be present when the locks were changed at five. Her landlord had given her sixty days. The notice had arrived fifty-nine days ago, on a Monday when she was teaching first-year composition. She had stayed after class to help a student locate the thesis in an essay about parking tickets. By the time she checked her mailbox, the campus housing-assistance office had closed.
“My big question is agency,” Evan said. “The protagonist seems to let things happen to her.”
“What would you have her do?” asked Professor Kells.
“Push back. Make a choice.”
“Like what?”
“I don’t know. Find the owner. Start a petition. Something active.”
Priya suggested contacting an elected official. Miles thought the story would be stronger if the woman refused to leave as a matter of principle. A student whose parents had furnished his apartment asked whether the protagonist had considered staying with family. Tess wrote six hours, couch, husband on her pad. The details were already on page four.
At four o’clock the class moved to matters of craft. A paragraph describing a storage unit’s monthly fees was judged too documentary. The distinction between a security deposit and a nonrefundable cleaning charge seemed excessive. Professor Kells wanted less procedural material and more attention to the woman’s inner life. Tess knew the charge for a ten-by-ten unit, the truck’s mileage fee, and what the pharmacy would deduct if she missed another shift. None of these had made it into the final draft because they were the sort of numbers readers skipped.
“The clock is a little heavy-handed,” said Miles. “Every scene reminds us the deadline is coming.”
The phone buzzed for the sixth time.
At 4:32, Professor Kells invited Tess to respond. She was allowed three minutes, though the handbook discouraged using this period to explain authorial intention.
“The deadline isn’t arbitrary,” Tess said. “I have to be out of my apartment today.”
There was a small movement around the table. A few people looked down at their copies to see whether they’d missed an important line.
“You mean the character,” Evan said.
“I mean me.”
Professor Kells folded his hands. “Of course experience is always the raw material. But we have to distinguish between the life and the work.”
“I understand,” Tess said. “Could someone help me get a dresser into a truck?”
The room became interested in its pens. Priya had a shift at the library. Evan had office hours. Miles had a dental appointment he had already moved twice. Professor Kells said his shoulder had never been right since a kayaking accident, then offered to email a former student who was good at organizing mutual-aid drives.
In the end, the student who had wanted the kettle smashed came along. Her name was Jo. She knew how to hold a dresser so its drawers stayed in place. They carried it down three flights, stopping at each landing to let the radiator pipes stop shaking.
At the curb, Tess handed Jo the stack of workshop comments. Jo had written four pages herself, mostly questions. She had circled the final paragraph and drawn a star.
“I still think the ending needs somewhere for her to go,” Jo said.
“So do I,” Tess answered.
Jo put the comments on the passenger seat and climbed into the truck. They had forty minutes before the storage place closed. Tess drove. Jo held the papers to stop them blowing out the window, which would have been a waste of a very expensive education.
Vic Sloane
Vic Sloane covers nightlife, galleries, clothes, vanity, and the social uses of bad taste. Editorial standards are high here, either that or the chief editor is just a dick. Und du kannst mich am Arsch lecken, Lester!
STATUS: UNRULY
“Normal” was considered and rejected.
KNOWN ASSOCIATES: readers, loiterers, people who should know better.
PUSH THE WEIRD BUTTON
A clerk has been notified. They are furious.